Remove Fox Remove Morals Remove Protection Remove Resources
article thumbnail

The North American Model of Wildlife Conservation and Who Pays for It

10,000 Birds

A new willingness among scientists to consider certain moral and ethical implications with respect to wild animals, where previously utilitarian ideas prevailed, including ideas of intrinsic value. As a consequence, “people should treat all creatures decently, and protect them from cruelty, avoidable suffering, and unnecessary killing.”

Wildlife 234
article thumbnail

Tom Regan on the Animal-Rights Movement

Animal Ethics

But prejudices die hard, all the more so when, as in the present case, they are insulated by widespread secular customs and religious beliefs, sustained by large and powerful economic interests, and protected by the common law. Moral philosophy is no substitute for political action. Might does not make right; might does make law.

article thumbnail

Should is not a Solution

10,000 Birds

I will address two of them in the new year, namely, “Is hunting moral at all?” And embattled minority should be protected. Dogs should not be used to hunt foxes. It’s a powerful motivator that has attracted millions of people from all around the world to devote time and money to protect these resources.

Tigers 170