Fox, Laws, Morals and Protection

The North American Model of Wildlife Conservation and Who Pays for It

10,000 Birds

DECEMBER 17, 2014

A new willingness among scientists to consider certain moral and ethical implications with respect to wild animals, where previously utilitarian ideas prevailed, including ideas of intrinsic value. As a consequence, “people should treat all creatures decently, and protect them from cruelty, avoidable suffering, and unnecessary killing.”

Wildlife

Wildlife Coyotes Hunters Wolves

Tom Regan on the Animal-Rights Movement

Animal Ethics

SEPTEMBER 14, 2012

But prejudices die hard, all the more so when, as in the present case, they are insulated by widespread secular customs and religious beliefs, sustained by large and powerful economic interests, and protected by the common law. Might does not make right; might does make law. Still, it can make a contribution.

Animal Rights Movement

Animal Rights Movement Animal Rights Rights Los Angeles

Animal Rights Zone

The North American Model of Wildlife Conservation and Who Pays for It

Tom Regan on the Animal-Rights Movement

Webinars

Stay Connected