Morals, New York Times and Pets - Animal Rights Zone

From Today's New York Times

Animal Ethics

NOVEMBER 24, 2009

If the goal is not moral perfection for ourselves, but the maximum benefit for animals, half-measures ought to be encouraged and appreciated. Mr. Steiner rightly rejects this view as morally flawed. If we are not justified in eating mackerel ourselves, are we not also morally obligated to stop the slaughter brought on by the tuna?

New York Times

New York Times New York Vegan Vegetarian

From Today's New York Times

Animal Ethics

OCTOBER 30, 2007

There is no moral difference between eating a dog or a pig, a cat or a chicken. For the same reason that most of us would not eat our pets, we should also not eat chickens, pigs or other animals. Borders Jr. Louisville, Ky.,

New York Times

New York Times New York Louisville Pigs

Animal Rights Zone

From Today's New York Times

From Today's New York Times

Webinars

Stay Connected