Critter News
MARCH 21, 2012
But I want to be able to argue about it intelligently, citing science, not just morals. Apparently, there is a lot of argument out there than animal experimentation is even good for humans. A drug may work on an animal, but fail miserably on a human. Drugs are not always predictable from human to human even.
Animal Ethics
MARCH 16, 2007
To inflict death or pain on animals for scientific or medical research is wrong morally, and ought to be prohibited. This does not mean that animals may never be deliberately harmed or become subjects of research. Hence, unlike humans, they cannot be called upon to sacrifice even for the good of other animals.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Animal Person
JUNE 8, 2009
For Engber, who dispassionately describes procedures most of the time, the "advances" in the medical care of humans are all well worth what he and other vivisectionists do to dogs and other sentient nonhumans. By the end of my time as researcher, I was performing behavioral experiments on humans. Maybe on paper.
Critter News
JULY 25, 2009
and an accountant and an economist and any other "expert" that uses their field to claim a moral authority. And those scientists are humans with the same motivations and agendas as any other human. It doesn't mean that you have the moral authority to tell me that I must support animal testing because you know better.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
100 
Let's personalize your content