This site uses cookies to improve your experience. By viewing our content, you are accepting the use of cookies. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country we will assume you are from the United States. View our privacy policy and terms of use.

Remove 2010 Remove Ethical Treatment Remove Welfare Related Topics
Mulesing Lamb Animal Suffering Protesters Protesting Protest Transported Vegetarian Slaughtered Slaughter More Related Topics >
article thumbnail

From Today's New York Times

Animal Ethics

OCTOBER 31, 2010

By carrying out a slaughter system that greatly reduces the suffering of chickens, Bell & Evans and Mary’s Chickens show that animal welfare and good business go hand in hand. Tracy Reiman Executive Vice President People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Los Angeles, Oct. McDonald’s, are you listening?

New York Times 40
New York Times New York Los Angeles Ethical Treatment 40
article thumbnail

US Retailers Concerned Over Australia's Delay in Ending Mulesing

Critter News

APRIL 7, 2010

Why change for welfare purposes if there is no clear economic benefit? Mulesing, in which woolgrowers surgically remove parts of merino lambs' rears to prevent potentially fatal flystrike, has sparked demonstrations and litigation by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA). Such an awful practice.

Mulesing 100
Mulesing Australia AWI Ethical Treatment 100
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

 

Stay Connected

Join 30+ Insiders by signing up for our newsletter

About
Webinars
Awards
About
Editions
Webinars
Awards
Editions
Topics
Powered by Aggregage | Terms and Conditions | Your California Rights and Privacy Policy
© Aggregage 2024