Animal Cruelty, District of Columbia, illegal and Protection

This site uses cookies to improve your experience. By viewing our content, you are accepting the use of cookies. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country of residence. If you do not select a country we will assume you are from the United States. View our privacy policy and terms of use.

Search:

DAY

WEEK

MONTH

YEAR

Select your country:
Sign up | Log in

Animal Cruelty

District of Columbia

illegal

Protection

Supreme Court to Review Legality of Animal Abuse Videos

Critter News

APRIL 23, 2009

The justices said they would review, at the request of the federal government, an appeals court decision that said Congress's broad attempt to discourage animal cruelty by outlawing its depiction violates the First Amendment. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit in Philadelphia voted 10 to 3 last summer to find unconstitutional the rarely used law passed by Congress in 1999. Thanks to Animal Law Online for the catch. You'd think it would be a no-brainer, but no.

Animal Abuse

Animal Abuse District of Columbia Philadelphia Psychology

From Today's New York Times

Animal Ethics

AUGUST 11, 2010

To the Editor: Re “ Disgusting but Not Illegal ” (editorial, Aug. 2): We disagree with your contention that the First Amendment protects animal “crush” videos. Stevens , the Supreme Court last year overturned a 1999 law banning depictions of animal cruelty on the grounds of overbreadth. In United States v. The justices were legitimately concerned that the law could impede valid speech.

New York Times

New York Times New York District of Columbia United States

Animal Rights Zone

Supreme Court to Review Legality of Animal Abuse Videos

From Today's New York Times

Stay Connected